Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

NFL Random Thought of the Day

Report: Netflix will pay “about $75 million” each for Christmas games
Published May 15, 2024 07:07 PM

Now we know why the NFL changed its position on playing games on Christmas this year.

Via Jessica Toonkel of the Wall Street Journal, Netflix will pay “about $75 million” for each of the two Christmas games to be televised in 2024 — Chiefs at Steelers and Ravens at Texans.

The NFL reportedly started the bidding at $50 million, with a belief that the final price could be up to $100 million per game. The final number, as it often does, splits the difference.

Jill Goldsmith of Deadline.com explains that Netflix V.P. Spencer Wang, without confirming the number, compared the expense to other projects.

“I would characterize each game as roughly the size of one of our medium-sized original films,” Wang said Wednesday.

Of course, original films can be watched over and over and over. NFL games won’t get much re-air traction.

Still, Peacock learned after televising a playoff game in January that plenty of people who added the service kept it. Netflix will be counting on adding customers — and hoping to keep current customers from canceling.
For the NFL, it’s a $150 million windfall, less whatever concessions the league had to make to CBS and/or Fox for taking two games that otherwise would have been played, and televised, that weekend.
 
Last July, a federal judge ruled that Flores can proceed to trial with his claims against the league and three teams: the Denver Broncos, New York Giants and Houston Texans. The judge ruled last March that Flores must pursue his claims against the Dolphins through arbitration.
 
Right now I'm looking at a headline on the News that reads: NFL Distances Itself From Chief' Harrison Butler.

Now this obviously is about news concerning these three, but it also involves "politics".

So I wonder if this can be discussed on the forum, since "politics" is banned.

I'll chance a brief comment, but demands are being made that the Chiefs "dismiss Harrison Butler for Discriminatory Remarks". I won't risk anything more because it might get the post removed for being political.

From the headline it also seems the NFL may have gotten involved with a comment, but I haven't seen that yet.
 
Right now I'm looking at a headline on the News that reads: NFL Distances Itself From Chief' Harrison Butler.

Now this obviously is about news concerning these three, but it also involves "politics".

So I wonder if this can be discussed on the forum, since "politics" is banned.
Nope. We can discuss Harrison Butker the player all day long. A damn good kicker.

Harrison Butker the social critic? Not getting involved in that.
 
None of this is by "accident." :shades:

************************************************************************************

Jets have seven standalone games in 11 weeks and two Sunday-to-Thursday turnarounds
 
If the two sides can come to an agreement, the Dolphins will have accomplished what many NFL teams have failed to do over the past 10 years. In that span, all but five teams have spent a first-round pick on a quarterback. Of those 27 teams, 10 signed their first-round quarterback to a second contract.
 

Jeff Pash’s Retirement From NFL Leaves a Big Void at Roger Goodell’s Side

The commissioner has succeeded in a role typically filled by lawyers because his general counsel has taken on so much.

Andrew Brandt | May 14, 2024​


To say Jeff Pash, who is now retiring from the NFL, was “only” the league’s general counsel, would be a disservice to his prominence and importance to the league over decades. He was so much more than that.

In a world where—you know my phrase—there will be lawyers, Pash stood out among the many in the industry working for leagues, owners and teams. Pash was a guiding hand not only for Roger Goodell, but also for the “members,” as owners are sometimes called in meetings. Goodell would often charge Pash with the responsibility of talking to owners—a group that never likes hearing they can’t get their way—about subjects that the owners just wanted to go away. Pash handled those difficult conversations professionally and tactfully.

Speaking of Goodell, he is the only commissioner among the four major American sports leagues—NFL, NBA, NHL and Major League Baseball—who is not a lawyer. Of course, there is a reason the other leagues have chosen a lawyer to lead them, amid this changing legal landscape. And there is also a reason Goodell thrives as commissioner despite not having a legal background. Some of that is Goodell’s skill in building consensus among ownership, but it was also the presence of Pash at his side. In some ways, Pash has been the “legal” commissioner, doing many of the things that Adam Silver (NBA), Gary Bettman (NHL) and Rob Manfred (MLB) are doing, just without the title.

There have been too many uncomfortable issues in which Pash has steered the league to list, but a few stand out.

A decade ago, the league faced a potential existential threat as thousands of concussion lawsuits alleged post-career brain trauma. Pash led the global settlement with more than 20,000 retired players, staving off litigation that could have cost billions. While it continues to surface from time to time, the concussion issue is no longer a threat to the NFL’s continued prosperity and popularity.

In another uncomfortable litigation, Pash encouraged settlement of a troubling case brought by the city of St. Louis, alleging the league was fast and loose with its own relocation guidelines in moving the Rams to Los Angeles. Pash knew what the owners would not like to hear: The facts were not good. It cost them $790 million, but could have cost many multiples of that after a jury trial that was set to begin.

And, of course, Pash led the league through countless player litigations, some involving many of the biggest names in the sport: Tom Brady, Ray Rice, Adrian Peterson, Ezekiel Elliott and more. The upshot of all of those cases? The power of Goodell was strengthened.

Beyond his professional abilities, my lasting impression of Pash is that he treated everyone he met with the same respect and dignity as he treated owners. I remember times at NFL meetings when, as other senior NFL executives looked past me to find someone more important, Pash was happy to engage, to talk about our families and interests. He was so approachable that I remember thinking, That’s the NFL general counsel? That kindness is rare among leaders of a $20 billion a year business.

Pash’s retirement will not receive much attention in the everyday swirl of NFL news, but it leaves a big void at Goodell’s side. There will be lawyers, but there won’t be many like Jeff Pash.
THE REST OF THE STORY
 
Nope. We can discuss Harrison Butker the player all day long. A damn good kicker.

Harrison Butker the social critic? Not getting involved in that.
How about God'ells woke NFL. It is what it is and if it wasn't for BS'ing with you guys and college football/draft I wouldn't be watching the NFL and their money grubbing woke ways. As it is now, I don't watch nearly as much NFL football as I used too.
 

Jeff Pash’s Retirement From NFL Leaves a Big Void at Roger Goodell’s Side

The commissioner has succeeded in a role typically filled by lawyers because his general counsel has taken on so much.

Andrew Brandt | May 14, 2024​


To say Jeff Pash, who is now retiring from the NFL, was “only” the league’s general counsel, would be a disservice to his prominence and importance to the league over decades. He was so much more than that.

In a world where—you know my phrase—there will be lawyers, Pash stood out among the many in the industry working for leagues, owners and teams. Pash was a guiding hand not only for Roger Goodell, but also for the “members,” as owners are sometimes called in meetings. Goodell would often charge Pash with the responsibility of talking to owners—a group that never likes hearing they can’t get their way—about subjects that the owners just wanted to go away. Pash handled those difficult conversations professionally and tactfully.

Speaking of Goodell, he is the only commissioner among the four major American sports leagues—NFL, NBA, NHL and Major League Baseball—who is not a lawyer. Of course, there is a reason the other leagues have chosen a lawyer to lead them, amid this changing legal landscape. And there is also a reason Goodell thrives as commissioner despite not having a legal background. Some of that is Goodell’s skill in building consensus among ownership, but it was also the presence of Pash at his side. In some ways, Pash has been the “legal” commissioner, doing many of the things that Adam Silver (NBA), Gary Bettman (NHL) and Rob Manfred (MLB) are doing, just without the title.

There have been too many uncomfortable issues in which Pash has steered the league to list, but a few stand out.

A decade ago, the league faced a potential existential threat as thousands of concussion lawsuits alleged post-career brain trauma. Pash led the global settlement with more than 20,000 retired players, staving off litigation that could have cost billions. While it continues to surface from time to time, the concussion issue is no longer a threat to the NFL’s continued prosperity and popularity.

In another uncomfortable litigation, Pash encouraged settlement of a troubling case brought by the city of St. Louis, alleging the league was fast and loose with its own relocation guidelines in moving the Rams to Los Angeles. Pash knew what the owners would not like to hear: The facts were not good. It cost them $790 million, but could have cost many multiples of that after a jury trial that was set to begin.

And, of course, Pash led the league through countless player litigations, some involving many of the biggest names in the sport: Tom Brady, Ray Rice, Adrian Peterson, Ezekiel Elliott and more. The upshot of all of those cases? The power of Goodell was strengthened.

Beyond his professional abilities, my lasting impression of Pash is that he treated everyone he met with the same respect and dignity as he treated owners. I remember times at NFL meetings when, as other senior NFL executives looked past me to find someone more important, Pash was happy to engage, to talk about our families and interests. He was so approachable that I remember thinking, That’s the NFL general counsel? That kindness is rare among leaders of a $20 billion a year business.

Pash’s retirement will not receive much attention in the everyday swirl of NFL news, but it leaves a big void at Goodell’s side. There will be lawyers, but there won’t be many like Jeff Pash.
THE REST OF THE STORY
Just another God'ell enabler.

Ruining football.
 
After more than 20 years, NFL Network’s Total Access shuts down
Published May 17, 2024 08:34 PM

Total Access is no more.

The signature studio show, a weeknight fixture on NFL Network since its inception, has ended its run. The final show was tonight.

Questions first swirled when the show disappeared from the schedule for a full week earlier this year. More recently, reports emerged based on a recent round of layoffs that the show was being shuttered.

At one point, it would have been inconceivable. Total Access was NFL Network. However, as the media landscape changed, the relevance of a nightly studio show diminished significantly. And, frankly, the show was never the same after Rich Eisen left.

The closure of Total Access happens at a time when Good Morning Football is two months into a bizarre hiatus, driven by the even more bizarre decision to uproot the show from New York and send it to Los Angeles.

These cost-cutting moves are happening against the backdrop of the league’s ongoing effort to unload NFL Network, presumably to ESPN. It never became what the league thought it would be, and it’s most valuable property — live regular-season games — could be sold to the highest bidder, likely generating more profit for the league than the network realizes by keeping the games..

It’s still unclear why ESPN would want NFL Network. The best reason could be to deepen the relationship with the league, making it inevitable that ESPN will continue to have a broadcast package when the next round of bidding happens, likely in time for the 2030 season. Having the league acquire equity in ESPN as part of that transaction would bolster that reality.

Regardless of whether future developments will propel NFL Network forward, it is in the midst of taking several conspicuous steps back. The human toll arising from the gutting of the network is, frankly, a bad look for a wildly popular and financially viable sports league.
 
An entity of Rules? Safety? Competitive fairness? None of these describes the NFL.

******************************************************************************************************************

NFL’s scheduling process ignores competitive balance
By Mike Florio
Published May 18, 2024 09:39 AM

The NFL’s justification for giving the Jets seven standalone games in 11 weeks — they “kind of owe us one” — was ill-advised. It also obscures a deeper issue with giving a third-place, non-playoff team so many non-Sunday-afternoon games.

The league loves competitive balance. That’s why the worst team gets the first pick in the draft, why teams have three games tied to where they finished in their division.

That’s not how the NFL schedules games. It does a projection based on which teams will generate the biggest ratings, regardless of what they did in the prior season. This year, the NFL’s projection regarding the Jets includes getting them in primetime early, before the wheels come off. Or before Aaron Rodgers blows another tire.

Of course, that approach won’t help keep Rodgers healthy. He has played four total snaps since his last game with the Packers in January 2023. Come September, he’ll play three games in 10 days to start the season. Twice in the first nine weeks, the Jets will play with only three days off in between games.

The league has resolved, for itself, the question of whether short-week football is a bad idea by hand-picking a statistic based on in-game injury rate with six days between games versus three. That ignores the question of how players’ bodies feel on Thursday, after playing on Sunday. (The NFL uses the same blinders as to the grass vs. turf issue; the injury rate is the same, so who cares if they have to crawl out of bed the morning after playing on turf?)

“Ask the players,” a head coach recently observed on the question of whether there’s a difference between Sunday-to-Sunday and Sunday-to-Thursday football.

The same source, who received anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject, added this: “Another example of how player health and safety is talked about but easily compromised for money.”

In this specific case, it’s both health and safety AND competitive balance that are being compromised. Given the reasoning for the draft order and the determination of opponents, taking a third-place team and giving them seven standalone games in 11 weeks ignores the issue of competitive balance. It adds an undue burden to a non-playoff team from 2023.

Right or wrong, the league loves to level things out. It wants fans of all non-playoff teams to believe their team can get to the playoffs. But it also wants the highest possible ratings for every standalone window.

So to hell with competitive balance, as to the Jets. Because the Jets: (1) are in New York; (2) have Aaron Rodgers; and (3) tend to morph into a slow-speed train wreck, every year. Let’s load them up in national windows early — even if that greases the skids for the skid marks to come.

Jets fans should be upset. The Jets should be upset. Rodgers should be upset. They’re being victimized by the fact that people will want to watch them for the same reason they watch car racing.
For the inevitable crash.
 
Another example of NFL's "fair scheduling." :toropalm:

*****************************************************************************************************************

Three other AFC teams, including two contenders, have more of a complaint about their schedule but were they “screwed?” First, AFC North rival Pittsburgh Steelers:

We all know the AFC North is a dog fight. It’s the league’s most competitive division, where any of the four teams could conceivably and convincingly win. That means balance is a razor’s edge, and an absolute sicko must have devised the final eight games of the Steelers’ schedule.
Week 11: Baltimore Ravens
Week 12: AT Cleveland Browns, on three day’s rest on Thursday Night Football
Week 13: AT Cincinnati Bengals, coming off TNF
Week 14: Cleveland Browns
Week 15: AT Philadelphia Eagles
Week 16: AT Baltimore Ravens
Week 17: Kansas City Chiefs, on four day’s rest on Christmas Day
Week 18: Cincinnati Bengals
 
Back
Top